题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

Stationary Company was a joint stock company incor...

Stationary Company was a joint stock company incorporated by four natural persons (A, B, C and D) and Fengli Co Ltd, with a total registered capital of RMB 50 million yuan. During the operations of the past three years, Stationary Company gained no profits in the financial years 2008 and 2009. In 2010 Stationary Company gained an after-tax profit of RMB 5 million yuan.

In the beginning of 2011 the board of directors of Stationary Company submitted to the general shareholders’ meeting for approval two resolutions. The proposed resolutions were on the following:

(i) The company would distribute dividends to the shareholders on the basis of 0·10 yuan per share with all its after-tax profit of RMB 5 million yuan for 2010;

(ii) For the purpose of getting financing from the bank, the company was to place a pledge with all the shares of its shareholders to the bank.

Required:

Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law, and give your reasons for your answer:

(a) state whether proposed resolution (i) on the distribution of dividends was in conformity with the law; (5 marks)

(b) state whether proposed resolution (ii) on placing the shares as a pledge for a loan was in conformity with the law. (5 marks)

查看答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能会需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
更多“Stationary Company was a joint…”相关的问题

第1题

In relation to the Property Law of China:(a) expla...

In relation to the Property Law of China:

(a) explain the legal basis for creating legitimate possession, and the rules for determining the matters arising from possession; (3 marks)

(b) state the right of claim of a LEGITIMATE POSSESSOR against various tortuous activities that infringe upon or impair the possession, or damage the immovable or movable property under a legitimate possession; (4 marks)

(c) state the rules of compensation to a RIGHT HOLDER for any immovable or movable damaged, destroyed or lost by a possessor. (3 marks)

点击查看答案

第2题

Fran, Gram and Hen registered a private limited company Ire Ltd in January 2005 with a sha

re capital of £300, which was equally divided between them, with each of them becoming a director of the company.

Although the company did manage to make a small profi t in its fi rst year of trading, it was never a great success and in its second year of trading it made a loss of £10,000.

At that time Fran said he thought the company should cease trading and be wound up. Gram and Hen, however,were insistent that the company would be profi table in the long-term so they agreed to carry on the business, with Fran taking less of a part in the day-to-day management of the business, although retaining his position as a company director.

In the course of the next three years Gram and Hen falsifi ed Ire Ltd’s accounts to disguise the fact that the company had continued to suffer losses, until it became obvious that they could no longer hide the company’s debts and that it would have to go into insolvent liquidation, with debts of £100,000.

Required:

Advise Fran, Gram and Hen as to any potential liability they might face as regards:

(a) fraudulent trading, under both criminal and civil law; (5 marks)

(b) wrongful trading under s.214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. (5 marks)

点击查看答案

第3题

In relation to company law, explain:(a) the doctrine of capital maintenance; (4 marks)(b)

In relation to company law, explain:

(a) the doctrine of capital maintenance; (4 marks)

(b) the circumstances under which both a private and a public company can reduce its capital and the procedure

to be followed. (6 marks)

点击查看答案

第4题

Ms Huang, a shareholder of the Daqing Limited Liability Company (Daqing), found that the g

eneral manager, Mr Ding, had accepted bribes from several suppliers, which materially caused losses to Daqing, and adversely affected the interests of all shareholders.

Further examination, through a Certified Public Accountant firm, disclosed that there were a lot of affiliated transactions between Daqing and Everbright Co, which was the majority shareholder of Daqing. Mr Ding was recommended by Everbright Co and appointed by Daqing’s board of directors, which was substantially influenced by Everbright Co. With a series of such transactions Daqing transferred huge profits to Everbright Co and adversely affected Daqing.

Required:

(a) State whether Ms Huang was entitled to take legal action against Mr Ding for his illegal behaviour of accepting bribes which adversely affected all the shareholders. (2 marks)

(b) State TWO different legal actions Ms Huang was entitled to take to protect the rights of Daqing and its shareholders due to the affiliated transactions with Everbright Co. (4 marks)

点击查看答案

第5题

Zhao, Qian, Sun and Lee were four shareholders of a limited liability company specialising

in bio-technology, each holding 25% of the shares of the company.

Several months later Qian intended to transfer his shares to a listed company for profit and sent notices to the other three shareholders asking for their consent. Zhao agreed and also expressed his willingness to buy Qian’s shares if the price was reasonable. Sun disagreed and claimed his right of priority to buy Qian’s shares. However, Zhao and Sun could not reach an agreement as to the proportion of shares to buy. Lee kept silent upon receipt of the notice.

Since Sun offered a price lower than that of the listed company, Qian entered into a contract to sell his shares to the listed company, which caused a dispute among the four shareholders. Under such circumstances, Lee decided to leave the company and requested the company to purchase his shares.

Required:

In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law:

(a) State how Zhao and Sun’s failure to reach an agreement on the proportion of shares to purchase should be dealt with. (2 marks)

(b) State whether Lee’s request for the company to purchase his shares should be upheld if the dispute was brought to court. (2 marks)

(c) State whether Qian was entitled to transfer his shares to the listed company. (2 marks)

点击查看答案

第6题

Food Shop sent a fax to Sanyi Farm to inquire about the price of tomatoes as follows: ‘100

,000 kg of tomatoes is urgently needed. Reply as soon as possible.’

Upon receipt of the fax, Sanyi Farm shipped 100,000 kg of tomatoes to Food Shop. The latter took delivery of the goods without any objection. On selling the goods Food Shop found that the quality of tomatoes did not meet the standard required and had to sell the goods at a 20% discount. Food Shop considered that there was no contract between the two parties, since its fax to Sanyi Farm did not contain the price, which was one of the essential factors to be an effective offer.

Required:

In accordance with the Contract Law:

(a) Explain the legal nature of the fax sent by Food Shop. (2 marks)

(b) Describe the legal nature of the act to take delivery of the goods by Food Shop. (2 marks)

(c) Explain whether there was a contract between the two parties. (2 marks)

点击查看答案

第7题

In the context of companies in fi nancial diffi culty, distinguish between and explain the

operation of:

(a) compulsory winding up; (4 marks)

(b) administration. (6 marks)

点击查看答案

第8题

In relation to the law of negligence, explain the extent of a company auditor’s duty of ca

re and to whom any such duty is owed.(10 marks)

点击查看答案

第9题

In relation to the law of contract, explain:(a) the postal rule; (5 marks)(b) the doctrine

In relation to the law of contract, explain:

(a) the postal rule; (5 marks)

(b) the doctrine of privity. (5 marks)

点击查看答案

第10题

Stine, the owner of an office building, and Mering concluded a three-year leasing agreemen

t in January 2012. Mering would use the first floor to open a restaurant. The annual rental should be paid on the first of each month.

In 2013 Stine and Mering entered into a service agreement, by which Mering would provide meals to the employees of Stine. The service fees would be paid on a quarterly basis.

In June 2014, Mering was declared bankrupt by a court which designated a bankruptcy administrator responsible for the liquidation. The bankruptcy administrator found that Mering had failed to pay the rental for 2014. Stine claimed the rental due for the year of 2014 as his credit and requested to offset the meal service fees for the first and second quarters of 2014. Stine also declared dissolution of the leasing agreement between the two parties.

Required:

In accordance with the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law:

(a) State whether Stine’s request to offset the meal service fees was in conformity with the law. (2 marks)

(b) State how to deal with Stine’s request to dissolve the leasing contract. (2 marks)

(c) State what benefit Stine could have if its request to offset was accepted. (2 marks)

点击查看答案
热门考试 全部 >
相关试卷 全部 >
账号:
你好,尊敬的上学吧用户
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
谢谢您的反馈

您认为本题答案有误,我们将认真、仔细核查,
如果您知道正确答案,欢迎您来纠错

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反上学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“上学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信