题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

He stayed patient and answered every single question, _______ obvious the answer was.

A、no matter when

B、no matter whether

C、no matter what

D、no matter how

查看答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能会需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
更多“He stayed patient and answered…”相关的问题

第1题

Jim was just about to______the question when he suddenly got the answer.

A.submit to

B.work out

C.arrive at

D.give up

点击查看答案

第2题

He was a deligent,deferentiallegialator, but everyone knew that he had not earned the seat; he had inherited it.

A.respectful

B.passionate

C.empathetic

D.communicable

点击查看答案

第3题

What does "She wisely refused to answer such a silly question" mean?

A.She refused to answer such a silly question in a wise manner.

B.It was wise of her to refuse to answer such a silly question.

C.She refused, in a wise manner, to answer such a silly question.

D.She was tired and didn"t want to answer anything.

点击查看答案

第4题

Section B – TWO questions ONLY to be attempted

Five years ago, George Woof was appointed chief executive offi cer (CEO) of Tomato Bank, one of the largest global banks. Mr Woof had a successful track record in senior management in America and his appointment was considered very fortunate for the company. Analysts rated him as one of the world’s best bankers and the other directors of Tomato Bank looked forward to his appointment and a signifi cant strengthening of the business.

One of the factors needed to secure Mr Woof’s services was his reward package. Prior to his acceptance of the position, Tomato Bank’s remuneration committee (comprised entirely of non-executives) received a letter from Mr Woof saying that because his track record was so strong, they could be assured of many years of sustained growth under his leadership. In discussions concerning his pension, however, he asked for a generous non-performance related pension settlement to be written into his contract so that it would be payable whenever he decided to leave the company (subject to a minimum term of two years) and regardless of his performance as CEO. Such was the euphoria about his appointment that his request was approved. Furthermore in the hasty manner in which Mr Woof’s reward package was agreed, the split of his package between basic and performance-related components was not carefully scrutinised. Everybody on the remuneration committee was so certain that he would bring success to Tomato Bank that the individual details of his reward package were not considered important.

In addition, the remuneration committee received several letters from Tomato Bank’s fi nance director, John Temba, saying, in direct terms, that they should offer Mr Woof ‘whatever he wants’ to ensure that he joins the company and that the balance of benefi ts was not important as long as he joined. Two of the non-executive directors on the remuneration committee were former colleagues of Mr Woof and told the fi nance director they would take his advice and make sure they put a package together that would ensure Mr Woof joined the company.

Once in post, Mr Woof led an excessively aggressive strategy that involved high growth in the loan and mortgage books fi nanced from a range of sources, some of which proved unreliable. In the fi fth year of his appointment, the failure of some of the sources of funds upon which the growth of the bank was based led to severe fi nancing diffi culties at Tomato Bank. Shareholders voted to replace George Woof as CEO. They said he had been reckless in exposing the company to so much risk in growing the loan book without adequately covering it with reliable sources of funds.

When he left, the press reported that despite his failure in the job, he would be leaving with what the newspapers referred to as an ‘obscenely large’ pension. Some shareholders were angry and said that Mr Woof was being ‘rewarded for failure’. When Mr Woof was asked if he might voluntarily forego some of his pension in recognition of his failure in the job, he refused, saying that he was contractually entitled to it and so would be keeping it all.

Required:

(a) Criticise the performance of Tomato Bank’s remuneration committee in agreeing Mr Woof’s reward package. (10 marks)

(b) Describe the components of an appropriately designed executive reward package and explain why a more balanced package of benefi ts should have been used to reward Mr Woof. (10 marks)

(c) Construct an ethical case for Mr Woof to voluntarily accept a reduction in his pension value in recognition of his failure as chief executive of Tomato Bank. (5 marks)

点击查看答案
热门考试 全部 >
相关试卷 全部 >
账号:
你好,尊敬的上学吧用户
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
谢谢您的反馈

您认为本题答案有误,我们将认真、仔细核查,
如果您知道正确答案,欢迎您来纠错

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反上学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“上学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信