题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

听力原文:Man: Well, Deborah, we need to think about the candidates who've put in applicati

ons for the post of area manager.

Woman: Yes, John, it's an exciting new role, and it fits in with the strategy development plan.

Man: Quite. It's part of a logical progression in our approach to management, carefully consolidating our skills base. It should mean a new chain of command, but based on tried and tested methods.., we'll be stronger as a result.

Woman: Well that's the idea. Now, the first one that's come in is from Colin...

Man: The assistant manager for the south-east?

Woman: Yes. Colin's clearly keen...

Man: But of course, it's an attractive proposition.

Woman: And I think that's what's drawn him. He's said his current post is demanding - as well he might - but that he's keen to position himself in the spotlight here. Reading between the lines, I think the alternative, as he sees it, is to move sideways to IT, which is where his background is. It would be a shame to lose someone like him ... he's hungry.

Man: Yes, it's a genuine application. He's a serious contender. I was struck recently... I think it was last month.., by his problem- solving abilities. He was passed a complaint - it wasn't really his problem at all - but he took it up anyway, about some faulty goods we'd supplied, apparently. I think he saw it as an efficiency issue, and so relevant to any responsible person here. And he reacted really well, so that the customer went away happy after all.

Woman: Right, and that suggests the qualities that are most germane to the job. Ultimately, I suppose, we're looking for a level of adaptability that it's fair to say someone in his position may not have had the chance to really demonstrate yet.., but his familiarity with the goods we produce is second-to-none, so I think the signs are there that he may become an astute analyst and problem-solver.

Man: That's certainly encouraging. And it's not just in the office that he's been looking good. I sent him abroad as part of that group a few weeks ago. The basic brief was to secure a continuation of the Asian contract. To be honest, that was a bit of a given, and what I was really hoping for was something extra. And sure enough, he clearly really worked on all our contacts out there, and he came back with some great new insights into how we might be able to develop bulk sales directly through warehouses, rather than through the standard agency channels.

Woman: Oh right, interesting - I missed the debrief on that one. But I do know he went on a training course not so long ago, and clearly reaped the benefits there. The content was mundane enough - 'how to produce effective reports' or some such - but he identified the points that really mattered, and saw that what it actually addressed was how to order the most pertinent facts for delivery to a team.

Man: So, it's good news all round?

Woman: Let's look at what his reference has to say. He does have shortcomings, of course. His confidence is very strong, almost to a fault, you might say, which could lead to difficulties on the patience front.., just because he gets the point quickly doesn't mean he's entitled to think everyone else does, that they share the same conclusions.., others may be behind in terms of objectivity, still grappling with issues that impact personally on themselves.

Man: Hmm, that'd certainly be something to watch, I guess. Still, we're not looking for perfection, are we? And we're not going to be setting up a lone operator.

Woman: Oh, far from it. Whoever gets the job will be well backed up. I was talking to the consultants the other day, and they were quite critical of our reliance on checking performance through the one-to-one appraisal system, so it's been decided that this new post will be linked into the cross-departmental advisory group that was set up a few months ago, and benefit from dealing with them and getting their input. That should help quite a bit.

A.plans to change corporate culture.

B.criticisms of management practice.

C.changes to overall company structure.

查看答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能会需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
更多“听力原文:Man: Well, Deborah, we ne…”相关的问题

第1题

宋元以前论述历代典章制度的通史的代表作被后人称为“()”,除唐代杜佑《通典》外,另两部是南宋郑樵《
通志》、元马端临《文献通考》。

点击查看答案

第2题

宋元以前论述历代典章制度的通史的代表作被后人称为“()”,除唐代杜佑《通典》外,另两部是南宋郑樵《
通志》、元马端临《文献通考》。

点击查看答案

第3题

中国史学中有“三通”之说,“三通”指的是唐代杜佑《通典》、南宋郑樵《通志》和宋末元初马端临《文献通考》。()
点击查看答案

第4题

南宋学者郑樵所著的(),是一部记述典章制度的通史,与唐杜佑、元马端临的作品合称“三通”。A.《通鉴纪

南宋学者郑樵所著的(),是一部记述典章制度的通史,与唐杜佑、元马端临的作品合称“三通”。

A.《通鉴纪事本末》

B.《通典》

C.《文献统考》

D.《通志》

点击查看答案

第5题

‘文献通考’的作者()

A.郑樵

B. 班固

C. 马端临

D. 杜佑

点击查看答案

第6题

在中国古代政治制度史的研究著作中,有三部著作具有里程碑的意义,被称为“三通”,请问下列哪三部著作被称为“三通”()?

A.唐代杜佑的《通典》

B.宋代郑樵著《文献通考》

C.元代马端临的《通志》

D.明代官修《明会典》

点击查看答案

第7题

《文献通考》的编撰者是()。

A.郑樵

B.杜佑

C.马端临

D.章学诚

点击查看答案

第8题

文献学上所谓“三通”是指杜佑的()郑樵的《通志》和马端临的()。

点击查看答案

第9题

史学著作《文献通考》的作者是()

A.马端临

B.杜佑

C.郑樵

D.司马光

点击查看答案
热门考试 全部 >
相关试卷 全部 >
账号:
你好,尊敬的上学吧用户
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
谢谢您的反馈

您认为本题答案有误,我们将认真、仔细核查,
如果您知道正确答案,欢迎您来纠错

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反上学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“上学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信