题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
performatives are sub－divided into two big types. They are explicit performatives andperformatives are sub-divided into two big types. They are explicit performatives and implicit performatives.（）
如搜索结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“performatives are sub－divided …”相关的问题
第1题
performatives are sub－divided into two big types. They are explicit performatives and
performatives are sub-divided into two big types. They are explicit performatives and implicit performatives.()
点击查看答案
第2题
Generally speaking, performatives are sub－divided into two big types. They are explic
Generally speaking, performatives are sub-divided into two big types. They are explicit performatives, implicit performatives.()
点击查看答案
第3题
A．The native traditions were subjected by the immigrants' authority.
B．The native traditions were too ancient to be useful to the modern countries.
C．The native traditions were dead ones.
D．Both A and C.
第4题
Although buses are scheduled to depart at a certain hour, they are often late.
点击查看答案
A. listed
B. required
C. obligated
D. located
第5题
Do we need cities any more
点击查看答案
I don't want to live in a city. Perhaps we divide naturally into two types: those for whom cities are vibrant and exciting, a focus for human activity; and those for whom they are dirty, noisy and dangerous. It may be unfashionable, but I'm in the latter camp. I do not believe that we are a species whose behavior. improves in overcrowded conditions.
A new study proposes a significant increase in the capacity of towns and cities through a combination of increased housing densities, lower on-plot provision for cars and more on-street parking, and the re-use of marginal open space that is empty of any amenity value. The benefit of this approach is to reduce the loss of green fields and to help "move towards more sustainable patterns of development".
This study suggests that it would be possible to achieve a 25% increase in density in a typical provincial city without changing the traditional street scene, although it would be necessary to reduce the size of the houses and substitute parking spaces for garages. Therefore, the cost of this approach is to have more people living in smaller homes at higher densities, along streets that are lined with parked cars. Can we really accept the notion that space within dwellings may be reduced even further? In times when, we are told, living standards are rising in real terms, is it realistic to seek to reduce personal space standards?
The streets of many inner suburbs are already lined with cars on both sides, reducing movement to a single lane. Increasing densities means accepting urban streets that are designed as linear car parks, bounded by even smaller living units and modified only by occasional trees growing from the tarmac. Would the benefits of higher density be worth the disadvantages of increasing on-street parking? Can we achieve a satisfactory visual environment from such raw materials? Higher urban densities may be communally good for us, but they will fail to meet the desire of many prospective home owners.
Those without economic choice can be directed to live in this way, but if we are to continue to rely on the private sector to produce this urban housing, it will need to appeal to the private developers' customers. Who will choose to live in these high-density developments of small dwellings, with minimal open space and a chance to park on the highway if you are lucky enough to find a space? The main consumers will be single people, couples without children, and perhaps some "empty nesters". These are people who can choose to spend much of their time outside their home, making the most of those urban cultural opportunities or getting away at weekends to a country cottage of sporting activities.
The combination of a young family and a mortgage restricts the mobility and spending power of many couples. Most people with a family will try to avoid bringing up their children in an overcrowded flat or house. Space for independent activity is important in developing the individual and in maintaining family balance. The garden is the secure place where the children can work off excess energy.
There is danger that planners may take a dispassionate, logical view of how we should live, and seek to force society into that shape. A few years ago a European Commission study provided a good example of this. It took the view, quite sensibly, that housing should not be under-occupied because this is a waste of resources. Therefore, it would be much better if the many thousands of old ladies who live alone in large detached houses would move into small urban flats, thus releasing the large houses for families. What the study failed to recognize was that many of those old ladies prefer to continue to live in their family home with their familiar surroundings and, most importantly, with their memories. What is good for us is not necessarily what we want.
A．Y
B．N
C．NG
第6题
Do We Need Cities Any More?
点击查看答案
I don't want to live in a city. Perhaps we divide naturally into two types: those for whom cities are vibrant (振动的) and exciting, a focus for human activity; and those for whom they are dirty, noisy and dangerous. It may be unfashionable, but I'm in the latter camp. I do not believe that we are a species whose behavior. improves in overcrowded conditions.
A new study proposes a significant increase in the capacity of towns and cities through a combination of increased housing densities,' lower on-plot provision for cars and more on-street parking, and the re-use of marginal open space that is empty of any amenity value (休闲价值). The benefit of this approach is to reduce the loss of green fields and to help "move towards more sustainable patterns of development".
This study suggests that it would be possible to achieve a 25% increase in density in a typical provincial city without changing the traditional street scene, although it would be necessary to reduce the size of the houses and substitute parking spaces for garages. Therefore, the cost of this approach is to have more people living in smaller homes at higher densities, along streets that are lined with parked cars. Can we really accept the notion that space within dwellings may be reduced even further? In times when, we are told, living standards are rising in real terms, is it realistic to seek to reduce personal space standards?
The streets of many inner suburbs are already lined with cars on both sides, reducing movement to a single lane. Increasing densities means accepting urban streets that are designed as linear car parks, bounded by even smaller living units and modified only by occasional trees growing from the tarmac (柏油碎石路). Would the benefits of higher density be worth the disadvantages of increasing on-street parking? Can we achieve a satisfactory visual environment from such raw materials? Higher urban densities may be communally good for us, but they will fail to meet the desire of many prospective home owners.
Those without economic choice can be directed to live in this way, but if we are to continue to rely on the private sector to produce this urban housing, it will need to appeal to the private developers' customers. Who will choose to live in these high-density developments of small dwellings, with minimal open space and a chance to park on the highway if you are lucky enough to find a space? The main consumers will be single people, couples without children, and perhaps some "empty nesters" (people whose children have grown up and left home). These are people who can choose to spend much of their time outside their home, making the most of those urban cultural opportunities or getting away at weekends to a country cottage or sporting activi- ties.
The combination of a young family and a mortgage (抵押贷款) restricts the mobility and spend- ing power of many couples. Most people with a family will try to avoid bringing up their children in an overcrowded flat or house. Space for independent activity is important in developing the individual and in maintaining family balance. The garden is the secure place where the children can work off excess energy.
There is a danger that planners may take a dispassionate (冷静的), logical view of how we should live, and seek to force society into that shape. A few years ago a European Commission study provided a good example of this. It took the view, quite sensibly, that housing should not be under-occupied because this is a waste of resources. Therefore, it would be much better if the many thousands of old ladies who live alone in large detached houses would move into small urban flats, thus releasing the large houses for families. What the study failed to recognize was that many of those old ladies prefer to continue to live in their family home wit
A．Y
B．N
C．NG
第7题
What are Tylenol and Neotrend?
点击查看答案
A．They are names of two drug manufactures.
B．They are probably two new brands of medicine which serve as a substitute for aspirin.
C．Tylenol is a drug manufacturer whereas Neotrend is a new substitute medicine for aspirin.
D．They are probably the names of chemists who invented the new medicine.
第8题
This division of science into two distinct cultural traditions, located in different types of institution, is highly______, but in recent years these two cultures have begun to______one another.
点击查看答案
A．influential… disregard
B．unlikely… join
C．suspect… benefit
D．propitious … separate from
E．pronounced … merge with
第9题
This division of science into two distinct cultural traditions, located in different types of institution, is highly______, but in recent years these two cultures have begun to______one another.
点击查看答案
A．influential… disregard
B．unlikely… join
C．suspect… benefit
D．propitious … separate from
E．pronounced … merge with
热门考试
全部 >
