题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

In the history of arts patronage(资助,赞助), entrepreneurs-turned-connoisseurs(艺术品鉴赏

In the history of arts patronage(资助,赞助), entrepreneurs-turned-connoisseurs(艺术品鉴赏家,行家) are a young development. The world's greatest museums the Louvre, Hermitage, Prado began as lavish civilization-is-power statements by monarchs and emperors; private individuals did not emerge as significant museum patrons before the 19th century. Until a generation ago. those wanting to leave their mark in bricks usually did so in a room of their own in a state museum: the Duveen Galleries at Tate Britain, the Abby Aldrich Rockefeller Gallery at New York's Museum of Modern Art. But in the past 15 years, that has changed: worldwide, collectors seek immortality in glass and steel, through a museum of their own, designed by an architect of their choosing.

These are not latter-day Henry Tates or Pavel Tretyakovs, democratic visionaries who paid for buildings and donated core collections to kick-start evolving national, state-run institutions. Museum builders of the 1990s and 2000s, by contrast, are products of late capitalism, dedicated to more personal projects, with an individualistic flavor. They represent the legacy of Thatcher-Reagan words of choice, private philanthropy (慈善机构), me-generation celebrity.

Together, these and scores more bring diversity and flatten old geographical hierarchies. In Istanbul, collector Sakip Sabanci's museum, founded in 2002, is the first ever to show western modernism in Turkey. Thanks to Dominique de Menil, the greatest collection of paintings by Cy Twombly, who lives in Italy, is on permanent show in Houston, Texas, in a gallery designed in 1995 by Renzo Piano. In 1996 the late collector and dealer Heinz Berggmen launched his Museum Berggruen in Berlin, giving Germany its only Picasso collection.

Is all for the best in the best of all possible worlds? Certainly, more private museums mean more art on display for more people to see. Today's collectors are reluctant to bequeath (遗赠) to established museums, where space shortages mean works may go straight into storerooms and stay there. By contrast, a dedicated museum maintains the integrity of a collection, keeping together outstanding groups of works, assembled with personal flair, in buildings designed to enhance them. Renzo Piano's light, see-through 1997 construction for Ernst Beyeler's cherry-picked modernist paintings in Basel is the shining European example. For contemporary work, private collectors have particular advantages: free of state bureaucracy, they can respond quickly to the fast pace, and show work in ways that are too radical for traditional museums.

How did the Louvre, Hermitage, and Prado museums originate according to the passage?

A.Donations of the richest collectors.

B.Patronage of private individuals.

C.Collections of connoisseurs.

D.Encouragements and approval by rulers.

查看答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能会需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
更多“In the history of arts patrona…”相关的问题

第1题

What can we learn about museums of the 1990s and 2000s from the passage?

A.They were characterized by democratic visions.

B.They were designed by architects designated by collectors.

C.They were built to express individualism and egoism.

D.They were built to promote Thatcher-Reagan aspirations.

点击查看答案

第2题

The passage cites examples of Sakip Sabanci's and Dominique de Menil museums to ______.

A.prove how private collectors enrich arts collection and flatten geographical hierarchies

B.show the symbolism of the private museums and the aesthetic transformation of a nation

C.explain the fact that the rush of private museums is destabilising the art landscape

D.exemplify the nowadays crisis of shrinking art resources and growing demand

点击查看答案

第3题

Why are collectors nowadays unwilling to donate their collections to public museums?

A.Because far too more art are presented for public institutions to choose from.

B.Because their collections might not be displayed due to the limited space.

C.Because their collections are inferior in value to those in public institutions.

D.Because they have fun showing and enjoying their collections of arts privately.

点击查看答案

第4题

What is the advantage of private collectors over public institutions for contemporary work?

A.They can choose from a wider array of art works.

B.They can gain huge financial profit from the work.

C.They can concentrate much of the important work.

D.They can choose radical ways of displaying.

点击查看答案
热门考试 全部 >
相关试卷 全部 >
账号:
你好,尊敬的上学吧用户
发送账号至手机
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
谢谢您的反馈

您认为本题答案有误,我们将认真、仔细核查,
如果您知道正确答案,欢迎您来纠错

警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反上学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“上学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
上学吧
点击打开微信